The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend: "a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."
He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior."
(CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)
Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).
"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008
Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:
A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist." (Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)
"A nutty lesbian blogger." (MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)
Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush
who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
Earlier this year I described how Washington state senator Dan Swecker was trying to give a state subsidy to the private anti-equality activities of Gary Randall and Larry Stickney:
The Crumbling Coalition of Fanatical Fringe knows that they're unlikely to gather enough signatures to get a referendum on the ballot. If they didn't, Sen. Swecker wouldn't have tried to give them a state subsidy by pushing Amendment 32, which would have required that the new DP law go directly to a voter referendum. What do I mean by state subsidy? Well, as Ken Hutcherson and Joseph Backholm have already explained, getting enough signatures this year would be even more difficult and expensive than previously. This is because the number of valid signatures required to get a referendum on the ballot is 4% of voter turnout at the last major election, and turnout was huge for the presidential election...Swecker's amendment would have relieved them of the costs, work and gamble of playing Referendum Roulette with other peoples' money. And, of course, the embarrassment yet again failing to get enough signatures.
When Gary Randall mentioned the other day that Swecker is still deeply involved with the referendum to repeal Washington's incremental domestic partnership law (Ref. 71), I realized that I had yet to determine whether this subsidy thing was a habit of his. Indeed it is.
Is this what they call a Hail Mary pass? Just over 5 weeks before the deadline to submit signatures for the smarmy Referendum 71 to repeal the incremental domestic partnership law, and Gary Randall begs for twice the bucks than he's been able to gather to date. So far, his Faith & Freedom PAC has reported raising just over $5,000. Yet now he's asking for $10,000 more. If they wouldn't give it to you when there was time to use it, Gary, why would they give it to you now?
Gary and his welfare patron in the state house, Senator Dan Swecker, say that they want this money to print and mail petitions to the 50,000 people Swecker just knows will sign and return before the deadline. Yuh. Sounds like desperate measures to me. But judge for yourself:
Since at least May 5, 2009, Gary Randall has been asking people to contribute to his Referendum 71 effort by making a donation to the Faith and Freedom PAC. The Faith and Freedom PAC page reads, in part,
The Faith & Freedom Political Action Committee is presently, exclusively committed to Washington State Referendum 71. All donations to the PAC are used for the Referendum 71 project.
That first statement is a baldfaced lie, and here is the proof: The most recent registration form for the Faith and Freedom PAC that Gary Randall and Senator Dan Swecker filed with the Washington Public Disclosure Commission clearly states that the PAC is not a Ballot Committee, but an Other Political Committee. Further, it is registered as a continuing (ongoing) committee, not a single-year committee as would be expected for a ballot committee. This means that the PAC is not dedicated to Referendum 71. In fact, Oregon Gary has used this multi-purpose PAC in the past to manipulate Washington judicial and legislative elections.
Washington law clearly states that "Any material change in information previously submitted in a statement of organization [such as the purpose of the committee] shall be reported to the commission and to the appropriate county elections officer within the ten days following the change.". A sobering list of "Civil Remedies and Sanctions" is listed here for those who flout Washington's public disclosure laws. Oregonians are not allowed any special dispensation.
Is this what they call a 
