News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Beyond the usual suspects - who is supporting Prop 8?

by: Firefly

Tue Jul 15, 2008 at 21:45:57 PM EDT


( - promoted by Pam Spaulding)

Here's at least a start in how to find out.

So today I was thinking about California Proposition 8 to ban same sex marriage, wondering who (beyond the usual suspects) might be supporting the campaign.

(I believe it's important that we in the gay community at least know who these people are).

It turns out that California is pretty good about giving people like us the tools to "follow the money".

If you go to this page of the California Secretary of State's office, you will find a listing for campaign finance for all of California's various and sundry propositions and ballot measures.

But it gets better:

Firefly :: Beyond the usual suspects - who is supporting Prop 8?
You will note the last link took you to the main page for Proposition 8 and lo and behold the major financiers for the campaign (pro and con) are all listed.

These pages truly are a treasure trove of information when you enter them.

What's so cool about these pages is you can download all of the campaign finance data on these organizations in an Excel Spreadsheet (see the little "download these results in excel" link)!  

And then if you look at this information it truly is a treasure trove of data, so much so that someone could spend months tracking down all of the connections herein.

Here's just one little tidbit I've found so far just with cursory examination:

If you look at these spreadsheets, the data includes the name, the company, and the position of the person if it's an individual giving the donation.

I'm particularly interested in high profile corporate donors to the campaign to keep gay people as second class citizens.  Here is just one item:

In the Protectmarriage.com section on the website, you will notice a $1,000 contribution from one Tamara Seymour, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Favrville, Inc.

To me, I know some of these are not all big fish but some of the stuff I'm finding -- with even cursory inspection still raises interesting questions.  While people have the right to donate to whatever causes they wish, what are people in the supposed positions of being responsible corporate officials, theoretically accountable to the public and stakeholders of all kinds, doing attacking fundamental civil rights of a large group of people in a compaign like this?

If you look at the main page of the Favrville website, it bills itself as a purveyor of "cancer treatment technologies".  Its business would not seem to be to weigh in one way or another on the same sex marriage equality battle.

Does Favrville wish to be associated via its CFO with an ugly bigoted campaign to deny same sex couples the same benefits as any other married couple has?  I have not written Favrille yet, but I surely will.  

Meanwhile there's hundreds of other entries in these spreadsheets to track down.  It's not so much that the money sources themselves are a huge pile of information, but the various connections and research links are.

Blenders cannot go wrong in downloading and tracking down some of the money sources in the battle to deny Californians true marriage equality at last.  

We know the usual suspects.  

I firmly believe that those who give money to deny us equality (especially corporations) ought to at least be asked to publically answer for their positions.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
This info needs to be put online in a format that ...
... allows it to get picked up by Google.

I think this is an excellent diary and the right approach.

It'd be great to see a dedicated site that keeps this info front and center until Nov. 4 ...

One of the things I've noticed with Schubert Flint (the PR firm handling Yes on 8) in previous initiative fights is that they're pretty adept at keeping contributor names hidden from sight as long as possible, and often until after ballots have been cast.  I'd hate to see that happen again here.

A little daylight, some of that California sunshine, needs to be diligently shed on Prop 8 support.  Great diary.  I'd be interested to find out what I could do to help on this front.  I'd be up for helping pay to get a dedicated site registered and hosted.

twitter.com/ChinoBlanco | youtube.com/ChinoBlanco


Colorado sunshine, in this case, hehe.
Though I have been a resident of California in the past, and am a monthly contributor to Equality California (and no, I would not be afraid to be personally identified as a Prop 8 opponent in a similar manner as I'm advocating here for supporters!)

I'd love to have as many people as possible download the spreadsheets that are easily accessible through the links above.  The more people we have researching the soft financial underbelly of the anti-gay movement in general and Prop 8 in particular, the better.

As far as a website, I am really strapped right now, but I do have serious skills as a database developer in MSSQL Server...


[ Parent ]
Webpages
There are free-to-cheap MySQL webspaces available. My own background doesn't include MySQL (mostly PostgreSQL and others), but I'm configuring it now on my system. Does anybody have a board available where anybody interested in putting this together can work together on this? I most certainly am.

It's tradition, that makes it okay. Hip-hip hurray it's weasel stomping day!
Weird Al Yankovic - Weasel Stomping Day


[ Parent ]
KnowThyNeighbor.org put something together...
...here in Mass to publicize the names of signers who wanted a referendum on SSM.  And they've since expanded to several other states.  They'd probably be happy to share advice and technology.  At least, it's a potential lead for Californians who want to pursue it.

"Our Liberties We Prize and Our Rights We Will Maintain" -- Iowa state motto

[ Parent ]
Nope
In California, petition signatures are not made public.
You better believe if they were allowed to be released by the Secretary of State that website would have been buzzing.

[ Parent ]
Wow, that's awful
People can secretly support taking rights away from their neighbors?  Very shameful policy.

In any case, I was mainly thinking of KTN for technology help.  They could be a model for online publication of donors rather than signers.

"Our Liberties We Prize and Our Rights We Will Maintain" -- Iowa state motto


[ Parent ]
Not necessarily; the anonymity works both ways
People can secretly support recognizing the rights of their neighbors without fear of harassment from other neighbors who oppose granting those rights.

When I found out that the names of petition signers in Mass was public information, I was really surprised. Who would bother to sign a petition if they knew that they could end up harassed and ostracized for it? And I'm not just talking about a petition to eliminate rights; what about a measure that would extend GLBT rights? What if such a petition were in, say, South Carolina? Would anyone sign it if their names were public?

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même merde.


[ Parent ]
A fair number of people feel that way, for sure.
KTN was somewhat controversial.  (Here, the Secretary of State makes petition signatures public, by law.  KTN made them easily searchable online by name, address, etc.)  The major pro-marriage groups kept a distance from them and they were shrilly denounced by the various anti-marriage groups.

Harassment isn't good, but ostracization might be appropriate, depending on what the petition is about.  The founders of KTN said that their purpose was twofold: to promote discussion and conversation between neighbors, and to uncover petition fraud.  I think their work was helpful.  Anecdotally, my partner and I found a name on the list that surprised and angered us.  It led to a good heart-to-heart with that person--and actually, to an apology and a changed viewpoint.

I can see that depending on the local political climate, this sort of thing could be used by anti-gays as well.

"Our Liberties We Prize and Our Rights We Will Maintain" -- Iowa state motto


[ Parent ]
Oh and thanks for the compliments!


[ Parent ]
Thanks David
FIELDSTEAD & COMPANY is a front organisation owned and run by Howard Fieldstead Ahmanson, Jr. and his wife, Roberta; the entity, also known as The Fieldstead Institute, has no telephone nor website. (great pic of the duo, ck it out)
http://wiki.darwincentral.org/...

TIME Magazine covered the Ahmansons in their 2005 profiles of the 25 Most Influential Evangelicals in America, classifying them as "the financiers."Ahmanson has big ties to repugs and the Claremont Institute, a conservative So Cal think tank.


[ Parent ]
And Knights of Columbus
Did you notice that they donated $500,000 to NOM?

"Neither Lifestyle nor Agenda"

http://tips-q.com


[ Parent ]
Caster Family Enterprises
All told the Caster Family: Terry, Brian, Cha Cha, Craig, Christina, Nick, Barbara, and Candice, have contributed a combined total of $235,000 toward taking away GLBT rights.  They own A-1 Storage, so get your gay goods out of that closet please.
What do they gain?  I really want to know.

Seems like a bunch of San Diego based construction companies and financial firms (what is it with San Diego area...thats' where the whole petition push came from.)

While googling, found this JD Silvetore (?) blog with a rehash list of big spenders to the National Origanzation for Marriage.
http://outfest.blogspot.com/20...

San Diego construction attorney (humm) CHARLES S. LIMANDRI has a whole section in his "resources" page on his website about supporting "traditional marriage".  What does he get out of it?  http://www.limandrilaw.com/CM/...
It links many of the usual suspects...FOF, FRC, CWA...you get the point.


Thanks for the A-1 Storage info,my units aren't with them
But it is definitely a company LGBTs could pound financially by just moving our stuff to their competition.

A-1....here's a clue
The two incomes no kids who have a lot of disposable income...that's a ton of queer folks, and with that disposable income we buy stuff, and then we store stuff.
see where this is going?

"race, taste. and History finally overcome....and you ain't there"
by Tony Kushner


[ Parent ]
And when we move in together
half of our stuff has to be stored, more when we give up large rural homes to move into a metropolitan condo...

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

[ Parent ]
I sent an email to BFLAF.
Which reads:

As you are a GLBT Organization I thought I would inform you that the American Thermoform Corporation, a leading manufacturer and supplier of products for the blind, has a Vice President (Ruth Haggen) who is donating funds to the Protect Marriage website in the State of California.  This vice president of the organization is donating to an anti-gay marriage campaign and I thought some of your site users would be interested in knowing this, and that they might wish to use products manufactured by a different company.

I am sure that your organization would not want to be supporting this Anti-Gay vice president or her organization.

you can see her donation listed on The california Secretary Of State's donation webpage at this link. (removed link for PHB cause I can't format).  

I hope this information is useful and that you will pass it on to your site users so that they can decide if they wish to support this company and it's bigoted Vice president.

Robert Koenig Jr
San Francisco, CA

Keep Marriage Equal in California.  


The trollish sounding blogger formerly known as BURNSEY


And the corollary question
who is profiting from Prop 8?

BADER & ASSOC. - PETITION CIRCULATING - $881,285.65
BAUER, DAVID - ACCOUNTING SVC. - $1,940.05
CALIF. REPUBLICAN PARTY - MEETINGS AND APPEARANCES - $500.00
CALIFORNIA FAMILY COUNCIL - PRINTING & SUPPLIES - $3,459.80
CARDINAL COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES - PHONEBANKS - $158,814.04
COMPLETE CAMPAIGNS - MERCHANT FEE - $2,365.02
DELUXE BUSINESS FORMS - SUPPLIES - $170.96
DOMEIJ, JON - PETITION GATHERING - $50,000.00
GLEASON, GINA - PETITION CIRCULATING - $4,603.95
LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW PUGNO - CONSULTING - $46,187.85
META INFORMATION SVC. - DATA PROCESSING - $45,217.09
PATRIOT DESIGN - PRINTING - $7,435.70
THE BROADCAST TEAM - PHONEBANKS - $122,500.00
THE MONACO GROUP - PRINTING - $4,614.42
VALLEY PRESS - MASS MAIL - $97,211.81
VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORP. - POSTAGE - $1,425.19
VISTEVA - WEBSITE - $676.25
WELLS FARGO - Not Listed - $181.00  

Cause any fool knows, a dog needs a home; a shelter from pigs on the wing


the usual suspects
Bader & Assocs and Cardinal Communications are big Republican operatives here in California.  Debbie MaCall of Cardinal was "National Victory Director for the Republican National Committee (RNC) in 2002 and while working for the Bush Administration in Intergovernmental Affairs at the US Department of Education."

Att. Andrew Pugno is the MAIN attorney representing the hate amendment campaign.

The Broadcast Team is based out of Florida.  On the home page there's a pulldown menu specifically aimed at churches.

Valley Press appears to own a spring of newspapers in red California ie. the Central Valley.

Can't find who Jon Domeij is.

OK, the businesses I understand, they make money, but
I still scratch my head wondering what some of these individuals get out of denying people their rights.


[ Parent ]
Jon Domeij
Jon Domeij of The Broadcast Team, a direct marketing firm in Ormond Beach, Fla., and a church member, helped with the follow-up from the telephone survey program, called God's Calling, the church used to identify prospects.

Also a usual suspect, just not from CA.

Cause any fool knows, a dog needs a home; a shelter from pigs on the wing


[ Parent ]
Jon Domeij
His firm is in Ormond Beach, but he lives in Port Orange.

http://www.knowthyneighbor.org...

Looks like he and his wife both signed the petition to place the anti-gay amendment on the Florida ballot this fall as well.


[ Parent ]
Although
how he managed to do "petition gathering" from FL is an open question. And if it wasn't petition gathering (as sworn on documents submitted to the CA government) what did he do that warranted an extra $50K on top of the $122.5K already paid to TBT?

Cause any fool knows, a dog needs a home; a shelter from pigs on the wing

[ Parent ]
Travel expenses to California
Hdqtrs her in California funding

[ Parent ]
Washington State has a similar set-up
The link to the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission is: http://www.pdc.wa.gov/. I have found public disclosure sites to be extremely useful, not only with regards to ballot measures but also for tracking who is paying to elect public officials.  

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même merde.

Well done firefly... keeping link.

But I like the way EQ CA has taken the advice of GLAAD and others and stopped saying same-sex or gay.  Now calling PROP 8 the MARRIAGE BAN. plain and simple.

SO VOTE NO on the Marriage Ban... ! Yeah! 

Also for the information on who profitted from 8... will use before NOV. I guarantee you. 



It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


of the 3 lame support groups they total about 75K money left
ONE oppose group out of about 7 or 8 has 225K left.

These skin flints can't even raise money to hate fags, guess that cash cow is on life support.

Anyone seen David Dreier on Prop 8, the big closet case?

"race, taste. and History finally overcome....and you ain't there"
by Tony Kushner


Is Equality CA aware of this?
I saw that too!

Where's the money for Equality CA?  How is money listed?  I'm confused.  I'm emailing this too!


[ Parent ]
Hmm, just skimming through this
I don't know which is scarier, the higher ups at corporations donating, or the woman who lists her employer as "God."

But there are certainly a bunch of "Retired" people on this list. Is this what happens after retirement? One finds they have so much time on their hands they have to meddle in the life of others. (Actually reminds me of my grandmother...) I think some people need a hobby.

watashi no yomeiri wa doko desu ka


Court rules Prop 8 to stay on the ballot
ttp://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-gaymarriage17-2008jul17,0,672698.story

Today in closed session, the California Supreme Court ordered Prop 8 remain on ballot despite opponents arguing the amendment was a constitutional revision that only the Legislature or a constitutional convention could place before voters. Gay rights lawyers also argued that petitions circulated to get the measure on the ballot inaccurately summarized its effect.


I'm mixed on this
If the court had removed it, the cry of activist judges would have been overwhelming. Assuming (and I'm cautiously optimistic) that it goes down in flames in November, all the ammunition of the fundies is blown at once. They can circulate petitions again, and they can try to get it on the ballot again, but with a defeat this November that all becomes exponentially more difficult.

On the other hand, I think the legal argument had merit. This isn't a simple clarification of the constitution, it's a change in the basic rights granted - something the court has ruled on already. But if they'd taken it off, getting it put on another election - one maybe not so favorable - would be made much easier.

Cause any fool knows, a dog needs a home; a shelter from pigs on the wing


[ Parent ]
Related question for Californians
Did Feinstein ever get around to stating her opposition to the amendment?  She has been Democratic deadwood on LGBT politics and progressive politics generally for some time now.

I'll be breaking my "No Republicans" rule and donating to Arnold if he runs against her--if I don't start hearing quite a lot about her doing the right thing, starting soon.

"Our Liberties We Prize and Our Rights We Will Maintain" -- Iowa state motto


No Arnold please.
Okay so the Gov has let his non offical statements be reported in the news.  Has he done anything else except let someone else repeat it for him.
Don't expect DiFi to make an official statement either in support or opposition to Prop 8...she does her thing on the federal level and refers constituents to state officials when state issues come up.  Arnold is the Gov of California so he IS expected to take a stand....still waiting for more actions.

That would be one hell of an expensive senate campaign if the two of them ran against each other.  Would be more than enough to help out a lot of local schools, or, hey, give back health programs to children which Arnold has stopped.


[ Parent ]
I do expect both her and Boxer...
...to make statements.  Along with as many Congressfolks and other elected politicians as possible.  Feinstein has as much role in the process as Arnold does, i.e. none officially, but a major one simply as a statewide elected official.

She should be pushed to say something.

I figure Arnold would get bored easily and not enjoy campaigning.  It will be easier to get rid of him after six years than to get rid of DiFi in a primary.  And, really, she's been disappointing over and over and over again.

"Our Liberties We Prize and Our Rights We Will Maintain" -- Iowa state motto


[ Parent ]
What do people get out of supporting Prop 8?
Several commenters have asked this. The answer is simple.

What they get is a sterling reputation they can burnish to a high shine as they stand in line at the Pearly Gates.

This whole battle for our rights, for as long as it has been in existence, has for most people been about only that.

Though for a few people (like Daddy D) it has been about money, influence, and power.

Those people at the Pearly Gates are going to be mighty surprised that a lot of people -- especially a lot of gays -- whose reputation doesn't gleam quite the way theirs does will also be allowed to enter heaven.


EXCELLENT post
I'm sending to all my friends & family here in California.

MONEY will help us fight this and ensure marriage equality stays in place.

Now if I can only find me a bf ... ;-)


BF?
Be careful what you wish for. Mine has been nagging me for 28 years.

"Neither Lifestyle nor Agenda"

http://tips-q.com


[ Parent ]
Califorians ask a straight in MA
Califorians ask a straight in MA, if you asked them if the lesbian couple down the street  were married or living together...they wouldn't know, and wouldn't care.
There are FIVE years of data from MA, that NONE of the hateful lies the Christian Right endlessly blathered about came true, not one heterosexual marriage suffered, not one church was censored or forced to hire queers, not one school system crumbled because little Johnny has two Dads, or two Moms.
The whole same sex marriage issue is more hyped than Y2K, and our marriages will effect you just like Y2K...not at all.

"race, taste. and History finally overcome....and you ain't there"
by Tony Kushner


Agreed Pete
New York recognized the same-sex marriages of New Yorkers who had the ceremonies performed elsewhere, primarily Canada.

There were not even that many eyebrows raised.

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid


[ Parent ]
this was a great idea
Thanks for putting this article together, I am definitely interested in helping however I can.  

...and its all moot!
Except for Californians possibly. If Massachusetts throws out the non Resident law today...watch the news!  I hope this means no matter what with the Amendment Californians could go to MASS too. Or if the Amendment passes does that mean that valid other state marrirages will not be recognized here?

It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox