News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



O'Reilly guest bleats about the 'female agenda'

by: Pam Spaulding

Thu Mar 13, 2008 at 09:00:00 AM EDT


Again, I'm not a Clinton supporter, but when you have this level of misogyny floating out on the airwaves, all women are being slimed. From the O'Reilly Factor, guest Marc Rudov, author of Under the Clitoral Hood: How to Crank Her Engine Without Cash, Booze, or Jumper Cables (no lie) said this:

Transcript snippet is after the jump.

Pam Spaulding :: O'Reilly guest bleats about the 'female agenda'
O'REILLY: Tonight, we begin a brand new segment called, "He Said, She Said," where we'll deal with issues from a gender-based point of view. The segment will run every Friday, but we wanted to debut it tonight with a very provocative question: What is the downside of having a woman become president of the United States?

...RUDOV: You mean besides the PMS and the mood swings, right?

O'REILLY: But guys have mood swings, Marc. And you know --

RUDOV: Right.

O'REILLY: -- they have other control issues, as we just heard with Governor Spitzer and we saw with various presidents. So come on now, let's be fair.

RUDOV: Well, you know, I'm joking. Of course, the main problem I have is if a woman has a female agenda. If she doesn't have a female agenda, if she just wants to be an executive for all the people, then all I care about is if she's qualified. And I have no qualms about having a female president.

But if we take Hillary Clinton, she specifically does have a female agenda.

Is this akin to the Homosexual Agenda? Do any of you gals out there have a copy of the plan for world domination?
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
sleight of hand with affirmative action
What am I missing? Ferraro's comment is incoherent. She says her situation was like Obama's today, that she's the first to admit that she was chosen for the VP slot because of her gender. But she was chosen by one man, and maybe a small circle around him - members of an "elite" group. Ahem. Obama has been getting chosen by millions of people DEMOCRATICALLY. It takes more than a minority population to survive the first cuts out of a large early lineup.

Ferraro's is a false analogy. There is NO correlation between her situation and his.


Clinton ought to appear on O'Reilly to answer this
Yes, Clinto ought to go on O'Reilly and debate Rudov about his statements. Further, she ought to skewer O'Reilly on the fact that it a Lesbian had written a book with a title that began "Under the Clitoral Hood" he would have been outraged, at least for purposes of filming.

Yes, Clinton v. Rudov on O'Reilly would be a delight to watch.

But not Senator CLinton....it needs to be Kate Clinton.

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid


I've got it!
I believe the insidious "Female Plan For World Domination" is clearly spelled out in William Moulton's groundbreaking work on the "Wonder Woman" comic book series.  At great personal risk to himself, Moulton was able to publish the ultra-secret "femmarchical" agenda encoded in the seemingly harmless storylines detailing Wonder Woman's exploits.

Apparently, the Female Agenda has to do with eliminating all war, spreading love and light, and everyone discovering the joys of mild bondage.

Wow, now that I look at it, that doesn't sound so bad.  Sign me up!


Misogyny
I have long loved Hillary Clinton and am a hard core supporter of hers so I need no extra push to stand up for her.  Were I not already a supporter the misogyny alone would drive me to her side.

I face misogyny every day.  Woman hating is ubiquitous.  When Hillary is bashed by the woman haters I feel the abuse for it is the hatred directed at all women.

I didn't need Robin Morgan to remind me of what I already knew in my soul and that is:  Woman hating is the only form of bigotry not frowned upon by society.  when women call it by its name, misogyny we are told we are too sensitive or humorless.  We have been abused for the simple notion that women are equal human beings and as capable as men when often time we find ourselves being far more competent than the men competing for the same position.  We are still paid less for the same job when we often work harder and are more productive than the men.

All this and more is why as a woman and for all women I feel I must both support Hilary and speak out against the misogynistic attacks aimed at her.    


What else is new?
You mean.... there's still prejudice against women? WOW! Whodathunkit?

That misogyny is alive, flourishing, and generally accepted with a snicker has been so blatantly demonstrated this election year, it makes me wonder how fast some people would continue driving if they saw a sign that said BRIDGE OUT. But never fear -- it's all imaginary. Ask any woman with a long history of feminist involvement. We've all been duly lectured about how antiquated feminism is because "the battles have already been won."

I'd like to think that incidents like this would give the "battles have been won" believers the huge kick in the ass they so badly need, but it will probably take something that will directly impact their lives. The O'Reilly segment will just be shrugged off within a day or two.

And before the Hillaryrants rev up, I'm not suggesting that anyone not supporting Senator Clinton is inspired by prejudice against women. But imagine an incident at an Obama speech equivalent to that knuckle-dragger holding up a sign saying "Iron My Shirt" at a Clinton speech. We'd still be hearing about it. But dissing "Hillary"? It was forgotten within 48 hours.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox