News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


Mike Rogers on Hannity and Colmes, and the GOP's agita

by: Pam Spaulding

Wed Sep 05, 2007 at 07:45:00 AM EDT


The blustering, rude Faux News pontificator had Mike Rogers on last night and it was great (save for Faux getting the chyron wrong -- it said "Rodgers"). Hannity was so weak trying to spin the Craig matter.

Mike was on point right out of the box:

"Larry Craig is a hypocrite. He is an anti-gay, closeted individual who has sex with other men. We have reported on men from different places in the country, at Union Station in Washington, DC, we see he's been arrested and has offered some preposterous explanations, and clearly the case is not going to be thrown out. Legal experts across the country have said the only way that he can get this case tossed out is if he proves to the judge that he doesn't speak English."
More from PageOneQ:
While Craig did commit a crime, Rogers argues that Republicans have a double standard when it comes to punishing lawmakers who have run-ins with the law. "It's astonishing to me to see, regardless of this incident, how there's a different set of rules for Larry Craig because he was with men, then say a Rep. Kevin Brady, who was guilty of a drunk driving offense."

Host Sean Hannity quickly responded that "I would say there are a different set of rules for Clinton, or for Jerry Studs," alluding to sexual indiscretions. Rogers countered, "But Bill Clinton was impeached!"

Mike has the video up at BlogActive.

***

Have you had enough schadenfreude yet?

When you have headlines like "Bathroom Sex Senator Hires Vick's Lawyer" paired with "Idaho Sen. Craig reconsidering decision to resign," you know that things are getting deliciously downright ugly for the anti-gay GOP pols and leadership, and it's their own fault. The knickers are now definitely in a twist as they have to deal with a defiant Craig. Has he decided to kick open a few closet doors of his friends on the Hill now that they've publicly stabbed him in the back? Let's see how many former "outraged" GOP pols start treading lightly or fall silent. That should tell you something.

[UPDATE: As many of you have noted, Roll Call has Craig's voicemail to the wrong number, where he left this message, intended for his attorney, Billy Martin. It's clear that the Idaho senator was leaving the door open to fight for his seat:

"Yes, Billy, this is Larry Craig calling. You can reach me on my cell. Arlen Specter is now willing to come out in my defense, arguing that it appears by all that he knows that I have been railroaded and all that.

"Having all of that, we have reshaped my statement a little bit to say it is my intent to resign on Sept. 30. I think it is important for you to make as bold a statement as you are comfortable with this afternoon, and I would hope you could make it in front of the cameras.

"I think it would help drive the story that I'm willing to fight, that I've got quality people out there fighting in my defense, and that this thing could take a new turn or a new shape, it has that potential. Anyway, give me a buzz or give Mike a buzz on that. We're headed to my press conference now. "Thank you. Bye."

Hahahahahahahaha.]
Pam Spaulding :: Mike Rogers on Hannity and Colmes, and the GOP's agita
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
voicemail
I don't see it mentioned here, but I just heard on NPR that he left this long rambling message about all of this on the WRONG voicemail!! An actual strangers phone. Dumb@$$!! This is getting so out of hand.

Craig's wrong number

TPM covers it, with a transcript of the message he left on the wrong answering machine

http://www.talkingpo...

Scroll down a few screens to get it, and then, when you're done being amazed, scroll back up and read the legal aspects of Craig trying to overturn the guilty verdict.  he apparently received a 3-page statement about the verdict which he had to read and sign, and so, in brief, he would have to say he didn't know what he was doing.  Another opinion is that the case could be overturned if there was something amiss with what the judge said to him in re having a lawyer.

Curioser and curioser! 

 



"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

[ Parent ]
Isn't it convenient..
that Hannity and the like seem to forget Clinton was impeached?  I'm glad Rogers pointed it out.

"I'm just your ordinary, average, everyday sane-psycho..." Liz Phair

Impeachment wasn't enough
8 years of sliming him wasn't enough.  Accusing him and Hillary of murder wasn't enough. Impeachment wasn't enough.  They wanted him tarred and feathered. wracked on the wheel, put in the stocks, exhibited naked and gibbering in a cage.  Their hatred for him and Hillary was obscene and insane.

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

[ Parent ]
I second that.
Ever chatted with a con about the Clintons?  There's no lucidity.  All sputtering emotion.  I think it's the Clintons' brilliance that they hate. 

[ Parent ]
And their humanism
The GOP is a rigid, authoritarian, anti-humanistic party and the Clintons' representrd core Democratic and American values at odds with these, caring for the less fortunate among them.  Hence the GOP frenzy about the Clinton health plan.  Make sure everyone's covered?  Socialism!  When you read anything about the New Deal and the ways in which FDR reorienetd the country away from laissez faire domestic policies, you hear the identical complaints and bashing from those who opposed him.  The forces of cruelty are still strong.  

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

[ Parent ]
Lev's arrows always find the bullseye.


[ Parent ]
Aw, shucks
Maybe that's because I just reviewed Juliet Barker's amazing book Agincourt, where there's tons of fascinating info along the way to the battle, including about the archers, their bows, even the feather son them.  Sound dull?  Not remotely!  My spouse and I couldn't put this book down.  Luckily we had 2 copies.  http://www.amazon.co...

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

[ Parent ]
Lev, I'd place a blueberry atop my head and let you shoot away.


[ Parent ]
Ahh--
--only if it's a big fat Michigan blueberry, and the season, alas, is past.

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

[ Parent ]
INTERESTING NEWS ABOUT CRAIG:

I just heard this morning from a source writing on Craig: Craig was not married when first elected to office in Idaho in the early 70's. He then met his wife and got married. Their three children (two of them who defended him on GMA this morning) are - get this...........ADOPTED!

His wife has got to have had prior knowledge of Larry's toe tapping.



"Yeah. Sylvia-Louise. You know, with a hyphen?" - Barbara Streisand in What's Up Doc?

Song cue
"Toe the line--love isn't always on time. . . ."

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

[ Parent ]
i think that's going way too far
whether his wife knew of his bathroom sex is totally irrelevant to the fact that some of their kids are adopted.  hadn't you noticed?  many straight people adopt!

Lurleen on Twitter

[ Parent ]
Choose your battles, people

In my view, adopting a spouse's kids has zip to do with homosexuality or homosexual compulsions.

Also, any human being in the entire world could mis-dial a telephone number.  He's probably pretty stressed right now.  And the message is not even remotely incriminating. It's a nothingburger.



[ Parent ]
OMG
Sew he cudnt even have secs wit his wife 4 kidz? LOLZ HOMO!!! OMG OMG OMG!

Seriously, grow up.

<3 Sam


[ Parent ]
More gooper flip flopping.
Guilty plea, changed his mind.
Resign, won't resign. 
It's a good thing that he can make important decisions and stick with them, isn't it?  What a great leader.

My America includes LGBT families.

Perfectly said


[ Parent ]
A tongue-in-cheek visual
See a tongue-in-cheek visual of Senator Craig taking a new stance...here:

www.thoughttheater.com


Bizarre reaction from his kids

From Yahoo News:

"Gay or straight, that part doesn't matter," Michael Craig says of his father

but then says ""we were shocked" at media accounts of the incident" ... "All these terrible things that were said in the media, we asked all those tough questions,'' Michael Craig said. ''I don't want to have an answer based on a legality or technicality or semantics of the words. We wanted to know exactly what happened and after speaking to our dad, we know exactly what happened.''

 

This family is totally sick in the head. They talk about "shocking" and "disgusting" allegations, then claim being gay is fine by them. Then speak of being tremendously relieved that their father is "straight". It doesn't make any sense, all the contradictions.



homosexual compulsions?????
"In my view, adopting a spouses kids has zip to do with homosexuality or homosexual compulsions. "

homosexual compulsions?????

Come into the 21st century with the rest of the world
(except R wingers of all stripes)
(sh*t!)

Javier,

There are, in my experience, some heterosexual men, or otherwise heterosexual men, who have some emotional issues that lead them to homosexual behavior, but it's "not who they are."  I'm not talking about gay men who are in denial.  I'm talking about real, actual, deep-down straight men.  For example, I've known straight men who were in the sex industry but involved in gay activity; they were drawn to it, but not understanding why.  That's where the "compulsive" comes in.  It was an erotic experience for them, but not because they were actually attracted to men.  Many gay porn performers, including some of the most prolific ones, are straight.  I believe Matt Sanchez ("Rod Majors"), for example, when he says that he's not gay. 

I've also known some straight men who were not in the sex industry who were drawn to being seductive toward gay men.  One guy used to actually lead gay men into thinking he was going to have sex with them.  He told me he didn't understand why he did it, but he did it, and felt like he couldn't resist doing it.  This person had an extraordinarily rough childhood, and I strongly suspect the "leading on" stuff was a function of some incredibly painful unmet need or needs, and/or abuse.  And often a way to cope with incredible emotional pain is to sexualize it.  (Becoming religious and/or taking drugs are other ways.)

Are all cases of heterosexuals engaging in homosexual behavior "compulsions"?  No.  I also know of some cases of heterosexual men who may end up having a de facto romantic relationship with a man, and some heterosexuals have at least experimented, especially in their youth, with gay sex.  But in the case of Larry Craig, if what Officer Karsnia reported is correct, here's a guy in a freakin' public bathroom in a freakin' major airport, who is already under suspicion of public bathroom trysting (per Mike Rogers last fall), with everything to lose.  The word "compulsion" comes into the picture right here:  No sane person, in his position, would take a risk like that.  It was not about rationality.

So, in fact, personally, I think his having a problem with compulsivity is definitely a viable theory.  He could be truly gay -- and compulsive, or he could be straight -- and compulsive (with compulsions that involve homosexual activity).

I hope I've explained my perspectives better.  My perspectives are informed by both training in psychology, and experience with actual straight guys with gay compulsions.  And I do think it's possible that Larry Craig is in that category.  I don't know, though.  He could be out-and-out (while not "out") gay, and lying.  Or the claims about his trysts or attempted trysts could be incorrect or lies.  I don't know (although the latter possibility I tend to doubt because of there being too many coincidences).

I think an awareness and understanding of the phenomenon of compulsive behavior would help us better react to certain crazy, obsessed individuals who like to hurt gay people -- such as Peter LaBarbera, Fred Phelps, James Hartline, and Billy Ball.  Psychology and emotional phenomena matter.  And while the phenomenon of compulsivity was perhaps first formally described in the 20th century, it is certainly still occurring in the 21st century.



[ Parent ]
About that adopted son ...

hmm ... could it be he and his adopted father have more in common?

 

http://perezhilton.com/?p=5024

 

;-)



Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox