News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



'Getting Out The Vote' at Maine's Bowdoin College

by: Louise

Sun Oct 25, 2009 at 13:00:00 PM EDT


Great local TV coverage here.

From WGME


Elections are coming up on November 3rd, and those on either side of the Same Sex Marriage debate are doing all they can to garner support. Saturday, the No On One campaign focused on students at Bowdoin College.

Registering college students is a key tactic to many campaigns, as the students may be registered to vote in their home state.

Dozens of students turned out Saturday to register and cast their ballots early. No On One handed out pins and stickers to those standing in line.

I especially like that the newly released numbers were also broken down to some degree in the piece...

Louise :: 'Getting Out The Vote' at Maine's Bowdoin College
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Bowdoin College
Where I live here in NH I listen to Maine NPR because it's a stronger station than our local one.  There was a call in show this morning with a few negative comments about the WGME piece.  A couple of the callers were upset that "out-of-staters" were being allowed to vote on Maine issues.  One person got downright upset and said if Yes on 1 lost he was going to call for an "investigation".  We had the same problem here not too long ago. People don't realize that a full time student can register to vote in the college town as long as he or she does not vote back in their hometown.  

I was just imagining the morning after the NOM defeat in 2 states
The "Value's" Voter conclave could ONLY muster 7% who thought anti-gay marriage was an issue to pursue.

HOW FAR does that 7% decrease after MILLIONS more are thrown down a rathole, more straight allies stand with us against lying Republicans, and the Vatican and Sisterhood of the Magic Undies slip in popularity?
Maggie Gallagher was already DAMAGED GOODS, not for being a propogandist, but for being a DUMB and SLOPPY propogandist who got CAUGHT.

I spit for luck so I don't cause us bad luck counting our chickens before they hatch...but it does make the mind wonder how LOW can this anti gay cr*p go, and survive?

"race, taste. and History finally overcome....and you ain't there"
by Tony Kushner


I'm in a college town too.

And our students just 'got the vote' a few years ago. We don't hear much about that being a problem, as our college kids seem to have really adopted our town as 'theirs' now. They come out in droves on Volunteer days etc. 

All in all it has been a great help to keep town and gown together!

Those who don't like 'others' of any stripe are just bigots anyway. 



It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


I've been reading some posts at University of Maine
One real crackpot was giving a lengthy description of what he thought must be science fiction worthy means LGBTs would need to go through to propogate, which bordered on CLONING and genetic manipulation and gave psuedo-science garbage of what he imagines genetics is like.
I hated to burst his bizarro bubble (oh no I didn't) to explain to his audience, LGBTs have or don't have children quite like heterosexuals have or don't have children.
Some of OUR high tech secret equipment....bastes your Thanksgiving dinner, other than that no great mysteries.

"race, taste. and History finally overcome....and you ain't there"
by Tony Kushner


[ Parent ]
Hasn't that cheeseball been banned from here?
User "Imagine" used to come in here all the time and talk about cloning and zygotes. What was his name? John unmedicated something-or-other.

God save ornery old queens! - kevinchi

[ Parent ]
John Harwood is his nickname at U of Maine


"race, taste. and History finally overcome....and you ain't there"
by Tony Kushner


[ Parent ]
Isn't our pet troll
named "John Howard"? AKA "Imagine"?

Awfully similar...


Best solution
The best way to get around Wisconsin's amendment is to define Civil Unions in a way that makes them substantially different, but still doesn't require enumerating some subset of rights or benefits.  The best way is to define them as "marriage minus conception rights", so that they have all the incidental benefits and protections, but lack the essential sine qua non substantial core of marriage.  The substantial core of marriage is that the couple is approved and allowed to conceive offspring together, and that would be missing.
Voila, better, stronger CU's, and Constitutional, too!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

by: Imagine @ Sun Aug 23, 2009 at 15:28:36 PM EDT
[ Reply ]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Troll Alert:
I believe our old friend John Howard (the Egg and Sperm guy) is back.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

by: Pollyanna @ Sun Aug 23, 2009 at 15:52:58 PM EDT
[ Parent | Reply ]



Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners

Click here for DADT photobook


[ Parent ]
here's John's goofy procreation stuff
John Howard says:
October 22, 2009 at 12:32 pm
Advocates for same-sex marriage are being deceitful when they claim they only want to be left alone to live the way they want to live. They never mention it, but they also demand a right to create children together using genetically modified female sperm\ and male eggs\ derived from stem cells, so they can have biologically-related children together (two men would also require a surrogate or an artificial womb to carry their baby, while two women could do it themselves, but, lacking a Y\ chromosome, could have only daughters). They don't bring up this demand themselves, because they don't need to: attempting same-sex procreation is legal, no law prohibits it. Labs could attempt it today, in spite of the enormous risk to the baby, and the disastrous effects that genetic engineering of human beings would have on society. But when I bring it up, l always get responses like this one from Liberal Angel\ a blogger at HuffingtonPost.com: If there is some procedure that can fuse male gametes together, then I will do that with my partner and God help the fool who tries to get between me and my child.\ It is, it turns out, the most essential demand of all.

Society needs to consider the ramifications of allowing labs to make children for same-sex couples before it declares that same-sex couples have the same rights as a married man and woman do. Of course, merely stopping gay marriage is not enough to stop genetic engineering of children, to do that we need a law like was recommended by the President's Council on Bioethics in 2004 (the same year that Japanese scientists created Kaguya, the first fatherless mouse created from two females) which would prohibit conceiving children that are not the union of a man's sperm and a woman's egg. But same-sex marriage would be incompatible with such a law, stripping from marriage the right to conceive children together that has always been the core meaning of marriage, and making all marriages vulnerable to genetic risk assessment and eugenic pressures. Same-sex marriage could also make such a law impossible to enact, forcing Maine to allow genetic engineering and same-sex conception, and requiring us to fund the research and the stem cell and IVF services that same-sex couples would require in order to procreate together.

So Maine should vote to stop same-sex marriage, and reject the premature idea that same-sex couples should have equal rights to procreate together that a married man and a woman have. There are better ways to give same-sex couples the protections they are asking for without inadvertently deciding the issue of same-sex procreation and genetic engineering of babies before we have had a chance to consider the issue.

"race, taste. and History finally overcome....and you ain't there"
by Tony Kushner


[ Parent ]
**headdesks**
Yep, same guy. Apparently he hasn't walked in front of a bus yet.

God save ornery old queens! - kevinchi

[ Parent ]
thankfully procreation sounds like it's merely a theoretical concept to Mr Howard
He's probably one of the walking unf*ckables

"race, taste. and History finally overcome....and you ain't there"
by Tony Kushner


[ Parent ]
agree
Here when we had the problem here most of the college towns came out in support of the students also. The instigator here was the Republican Party who knew most of the kids would vote for liberal issues and they wanted to stop them from voting.  I always notice that the GOP  tries to minimize the vote more than getting out their own voters. We even had them pay some outfit to jam the telephone lines a Democratic group that was driving people to the polls.

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox