News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile

Access 11/5 Senate ENDA Hearing Live Blog

Access Tuesday's Election Live Blog


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


The Top Ten Ways You Know You're A Christian Fundamentalist

by: RadicalRuss

Thu Jul 02, 2009 at 18:11:14 PM EDT


(Top Ten Top Ten) 1 - You are a christian fundamentalist when you actually know a lot less than many atheists and agnostics do about the Bible, Christianity, and church history - but still call yourself a Christian.

2 - You define 0.01% as a "high success rate" when it comes to answered prayers. You consider that to be evidence that prayer works. And you think that the remaining 99.99% FAILURE was simply the will of God.

3 - While modern science, history, geology, biology, and physics have failed to convince you otherwise, some idiot rolling around on the floor speaking in "tongues" may be all the evidence you need to "prove" Christianity.

Copyright prevents me from posting the other seven, but they are equally valid and funny.
RadicalRuss :: The Top Ten Ways You Know You're A Christian Fundamentalist
Tags: (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Hey!! SOme of us ARE fundamentalist Christians!!
But then again when its funny its funny. Though I can't laugh right now, I'm busy being Spiritual! ;)

Always thinking about it...

Discriminatory Post
. . . but I love it! And Radical Russ is just exercising his right to free speech. Uh oh, does that make him guilty of a hate crime? Better check with the fundamentalist christians, they're the experts on that and would know. LOL!!!

Close the GayTM. Only give to candidates who have actually done something other than make promises - most are just pandering for our cash.

Between the bigotry and the name calling;
I have to say that between the bigotry and the name calling i find in headlines here that I can't help but think this erodes the otherwise high credibility the Blend could have.

Being a fundamentalist Christian I am quite offended at this display of antisocial behavior from a group that demands tolerance form others.

Maybe that is the problem;
You cannot demand tolerance.  


Like a kid on the playground
But Mommy they started it!!!!

Close the GayTM. Only give to candidates who have actually done something other than make promises - most are just pandering for our cash.

[ Parent ]
Antisocial behavior?
This isn't "pot and kettle"... this is like an entire earthenware FACTORY gone fakokta.

Fundamentalist Christians tell GLBT people we're going to endure eternal suffering, on account of a single fact about ourselves that causes no harm to others, and that's supposed to be OK.  But when someone, in turn, pokes fun at that belief system, it's some kind of inexcusable sin?!?


[ Parent ]
As it happens,
I've just recently posted a diary about the ongoing assertion that any difference with or criticism of Christianity is "bigotry."  http://www.pamshouseblend.com/...

Most Christians seem to consider their beliefs immune to any kind of intellectual scrutiny, satiric or otherwise.  Any attempt to engage them in a dialogue about their doctrines or their history is met immediately and LOUDLY with cries of "Bigotry!  Intolerance!  Incivility!"  Adding "Antisocial!" to that is an amusing new twist, but it's just more of the same anti-intellectual, passive-aggressive behavior we've come to expect.

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
Here's the difference re: anti-Christian bigorty
ME: I find preposterous your belief that your consciousness survives death through telepathic subservience to a 2,000-year-dead reanimated flying zombie.

That is an opinion.

ME: I find preposterous your belief that your consciousness survives death through telepathic subservience to a 2,000-year-dead reanimated flying zombie, and because of that, I am going to hit you in the face, deny you a job or a home, and deny you and the person you love dignity, respect, and equal protection under the law.

That is anti-Christian bigotry.

To be fair, I extend the same analogy to Fred Phelps.

PHELPS:  God hates fags!

That is an opinion.

PHELPS:  God hates fags, and because of that, we should hit gay people in the face, deny them a job or a home, and deny them and the people they love dignity, respect, and equal protection under the law.

That is anti-gay bigotry.

"If people let government decide which foods they eat and medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson


[ Parent ]
I do not demand tolerance
I demand my human rights. After I have those, we'll talk about tolerance in regard to things that are not rights, such as having others refrain from satirizing one's religious opinions and choices.

[ Parent ]
Fundamentalist Christian Top Ten List

The Top Ten Ways You Know You're A Christian Fundamentalist list is mean, ugly and vindicitive. I don't understand how you can scream about and demand tolerance yet show so little for others.

Stephen


Hypocrisy
For me, it's all about calling out the hypocrisy. He who lives in glass houses. . . I really couldn't give a crap about somebody's religious beliefs, but when religious beliefs, which are without a doubt by choice, are used to oppress me becuase of my sexual-orientation, which is by no means by choice, I have to admit that comedy like this is therapeutic. And, I'm sorry but I spent 40 years of my life being "tolerant" of religious beliefs, but a person can only take so much crap. Yeah, ny mother told me to not fight back when I'm being bullied , but 40 years of stones being hurled at me has made me change my mind - my mom was wrong - fight back!! And besides, if you declare war on a group of people, you can hardly expect to not be criticized. Oh, the self-righteousness.

Close the GayTM. Only give to candidates who have actually done something other than make promises - most are just pandering for our cash.

[ Parent ]
"Mean, ugly and vindictive"
The Christian church has been actively persecuting LGBT people ever since it acquired the political power to do it.  It has imprisoned, tortured, castrated and even executed us, all because of a few random lines in the sacred gook of a tribe of Bronze Age nomads.  And you  have the gall to preach tolerance to us?  That's actually funnier than the Top 10 List.

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
Right On My Brother


Close the GayTM. Only give to candidates who have actually done something other than make promises - most are just pandering for our cash.

[ Parent ]
I never tire of quoting Karl Popper to you guys
"Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal."

Karl Popper, The Open Society and its Enemies

We have no obligation to tolerate the intolerant.  None whatsoever.  

"If a bullet should go through my head let that bullet go through every closet door."
Harvey Milk


[ Parent ]
I agree with the assertion that intolerance
need not be tolerated.

While I like Popper, and was / am hugely influenced by him, and his concept of the Open Society, I disagree with his assertion that

But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.

Not for idealistic reasons, but for practical reasons. IMO, the best way to deal with intolerant views, is by debate, argument, ridicule, satire. Not by suppression which leaves those views unchallenged.


[ Parent ]
Tolerance <> Agreement
Oh, it's no more mean, ugly, or vindictive than a night of Jeff Foxworthy jokes are to Southern men.

See, the reason why this would be different than, say, "Top Ten Ways You Know You're a Gay Man", is that it is a satire of a chosen set of beliefs, not a blanket generalization of people with a shared inherent trait.

Besides, that list only needs one bullet point:

  • You desire men.

The people (like you) offended by that list are offended because someone is pointing out flaws in the logic of the beliefs they have chosen.  My guess is that someone more secure in their faith wouldn't be offended.

But thanks for being a shining illustration of #10:

10 - You vigorously deny the existence of thousands of gods claimed by other religions, but feel outraged when someone denies the existence of yours.


"If people let government decide which foods they eat and medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson

[ Parent ]
I'd point out that a lot of non-fundamentalist Christians
believe that prayer can work too.  

So?
A lot of people believe in flying saucers, Bigfoot and the chupacabra, too.  Does that make them real?

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
Come on QScribe
Alan's point was not that prayer was real. He was simply pointing out a fact.

[ Parent ]
I believe too!
I believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, Marinara be upon him. Praise Linguini, Sauce and Holy Gnocchi, Amen.

[ Parent ]
LOL
Now that shit is funny!!!

Close the GayTM. Only give to candidates who have actually done something other than make promises - most are just pandering for our cash.

[ Parent ]
If you click to see who these people objecting to this post are...
You will see that neither one of them have an email or webpage listed.

One of the bad things about blogs like this is that one person can create multiple accounts and spam the threads with their criticism.

LiZ - Just started commenting today. No email, no webpage.

steviep - Just started commenting today. No email, no webpage.

I suspect that it is the same person with two accounts.

That out of the way...

Making a joke about someone or a group does not constitute intolerance. There has to me malice and an intent to harm.

Satire and humor are often attacked as being intolerance. However, it rarely rises to that level. Just as the new Bruno movie is certain to be offensive to many gay people, it won't be an example of intolerance. In fact, it can be argued that satire can help aid in understanding and encourage tolerance.

A top ten list about the bathroom habits of men would not be viewed as intolerant -- simply a social commentary. This top ten list is the same.

When you look for the bad in mankind, expecting to find it, you surely will.

- Abraham Lincoln.


I, too, am a Christian
but I do not rely on my beliefs to support bigoted views which promote legalized discrimination against me and my family.

Therein lies the difference.  We have the right to laugh away all we want.  I'm telling the truth when I say I don't want to legalize Christianity's extinction in America.  

They are liars when they insist we are attacking their "Christian" values when anyone who's ever read the Book knows Jesus wouldn't treat homosexuals in the manner  in which these "Christians" so comfortably treat us.

"Whatsoever you do to the least of my people", I argue,  is the moral equivalent of "all [humans] are created equal".


Ahhhhh
an intelligent unreactionary comment. Well done.

Close the GayTM. Only give to candidates who have actually done something other than make promises - most are just pandering for our cash.

[ Parent ]
you know you're a fundamentalist when you know a lot less about the bible....
A well-known phenomenon in some smarter circles. A lot of the more fundy people seem to think that the Sermon on the Mount was by Billy Graham, that Joan of Arc was Noah's wife, that Sodom and Gomorrah were married (!).

http://www.ccel.org/contrib//e...

And of course, no one told the poor dears that King James I (of the KJ Version) was the biggest fairy of the Reformation.

And don't get me started about Jesus and his encounter with the Gabardine Swine.


Don't forget
Moses walked on water.

That one was from Jason Stackhouse the other night. Grrrrrrr!

When you look for the bad in mankind, expecting to find it, you surely will.

- Abraham Lincoln.


[ Parent ]
Speaking of which
"speaking in tongues" is by far my favorite misconception prevalent in certain denominations.  For someone to portray the "gift" of "tongues" as random sounds is pathetic.  A simple read of the pertinent passages via any translation reveals that (according to Faith) the Spirit gives to some the ability to speak in languages other than those they grew up with.  Some of the texts could be taken to reflect an early explanation of some peoples ability to be easily multilingual, but at least one passage specifically refers to someone speaking in tongues as meaning that as a person spoke to a crowd in his own language of birth, each listener heard the speaker in their own language.  A far cry from the ridiculous, unintelligible babbling that hucksters have foisted upon their congregations.  

[ Parent ]
Oh they do know that King James was gay
Many fundamentalists are now turning to other translations because of it.  

"They say that time changes things, but you actually have to change them yourself." - Andy Warhol



"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction" - Blaise Pascal


[ Parent ]
Are they turning to other translations
because they know James was gay or because a lot of modern "translations" are tailor-made to reinforce their prejudices?

A few years ago some "scholars" published a "translation" of the New Testament that eliminated all references to slavery, for instance.  (They changed "slave" to "servant" and "slavery" to "service.")  Arrant nonsense.  But more and more new "translations" of the Bible seem designed to scrub all the, er, inconvenient bits out of the narrative.

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
I wish I could find the site again
I can't bookmark everything lol, it was stated on some fundie site that they could no longer feel comfortable using a Bible that was commissioned by a "homosexual" They were mostly turning to the New International Version, I don't know if that one has been scrubbed.......
Lots of comments followed the original piece about what versions they were recommending.  

"They say that time changes things, but you actually have to change them yourself." - Andy Warhol



"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction" - Blaise Pascal


[ Parent ]
Interesting.
First time I've heard this.  But it's certainly in character for them.

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
Biblical translation
It seems to me if God dictates a book and humans write it down, the words they write must be the most perfect possible human transcription of the actual concepts God was dictating.  Any translation of the original into another language is going to lose the accuracy of God's original concepts, much like a joke that is funny in Spanish may not be when translated to German (then again, not much is funny in German.)

That there are any translations of the Bible at all tell me it is not holy.  (This is a concept where I think the Muslims have the Christians beat - don't all copies of the Quran require the original Arabic alongside any translations?)

For some reason, this reminds me of the Infectious Groove lyric "Do unto others / As you'd do unto yourself / Of course for me that's damn easy / Because I hate myself".

"If people let government decide which foods they eat and medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson


[ Parent ]
Number 1 is spot on
LOL

"They say that time changes things, but you actually have to change them yourself." - Andy Warhol



"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction" - Blaise Pascal


A Perfect Example...
... of a common mistake.  We should respect one another's RIGHT to believe whatever he or she likes.  We are under no obligation whatsoever to respect the BELIEFS THEMSELVES.  

People forget this critical difference when it suits them.

Frankly, there are many beliefs that are not worthy of respect. Still, believe them if you like.  Just don't expect me to erect a satire free zone around them.


I would also add
That if you have a belief, don't assume everyone shares it.  Also, don't use your belief to justify poor treatment of other people, whom your belief system teaches are of less value than you.


[ Parent ]
Robert Heinlein once wrote:
"One man's religion is another man's belly laugh."

[ Parent ]
Robert Heinlein also wrote:
Heinlein on Religion

"Men rarely if ever dream up a god superior to themselves. Most gods have the manners and morals of a spoiled child."

"God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent - it says so right here on the label. If you have a mind capable of believing all three of these attributes simultaneously, I have a wonderful bargain for you. No checks, please. Cash and in small bills."

"History does not record anywhere at any time a religion that has any rational basis. Religion is a crutch for people not strong enough to stand up to the unknown without help. But, like dandruff, most people do have a religion and spend time and money on it and seem to derive considerable pleasure from fiddling with it."

"Of all the strange crimes that humanity has legislated out of nothing, blasphemy is the most amazing - with obscenity and indecent exposure fighting it out for second and third place." (I'd put "controlled substances" up in that list somewhere, too.)

"Sin lies only in hurting other people unnecessarily. All other sins are invented nonsense. (Hurting yourself is not sinful--just stupid.)"

"The most ridiculous concept ever perpetrated by H.Sapiens is that the Lord God of Creation, Shaper and Ruler of the Universes, wants the saccharine adoration of his creations, that he can be persuaded by their prayers, and becomes petulant if he does not receive this flattery. Yet this ridiculous notion, without one real shred of evidence to bolster it, has gone on to found one of the oldest, largest and least productive industries in history."

"When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, 'This you may not read, this you may not see, this you are forbidden to know,' the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives. Mighty little force is needed to control a man whose mind has been hoodwinked; contrariwise, no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything--you can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."

"It is a truism that almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so, and will follow it by suppressing opposition, subverting all education to seize early the minds of the young, and by killing, locking up, or driving underground all heretics."

"A religion is sometime a source of happiness, and I would not deprive anyone of happiness. But it is a comfort appropriate for the weak, not for the strong. The great trouble with religion - any religion - is that a religionist, having accepted certain propositions by faith, cannot thereafter judge those propositions by evidence. One may bask at the warm fire of faith or choose to live in the bleak certainty of reason- but one cannot have both."

And if you let your nine-year-old son read everything the Master wrote by age thirteen, he too may turn out to be a "Radical" Russ.

"If people let government decide which foods they eat and medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson


[ Parent ]
or as I like to put it...
If organzied relgion, especially fundamentalist Christianioty, wants to be respected, maybe it should start acting respectably.

I love this thread. . .
Best thing on the web all week!!! And kudos to Ben for the pointing out the obvious but very often overlooked aspect of respectability.

Close the GayTM. Only give to candidates who have actually done something other than make promises - most are just pandering for our cash.

[ Parent ]
Mark Twain was here a century before us
You want reflections on Christian hypocrisy, the nastier parts of the Old Testament, and a harpoon into the loudly pious, read Mark Twain, esp. his Letters from the Earth, Letter to the Earth, and the War Prayer. In his final decade or so, he was a piercing observer.

Shhh!
Mark Twain is an American icon.  We mustn't ever hint that he was in any way critical of the established order.  Let's be good, patriotic, Christian citizens and keep it to ourselves.

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
I've met a few seriously fundementalist Christians
They came from conservative Pentacostal congregations.
One was a decon at MCC, one founded MCC, and one was my favorite MCC minister, (she delved into the 6 admonishments and did an entire series of sermons that were breathtaking.)
The deacon had survived ex-gay ministries and such self loathing he had submitted to electro-shock treatments.

So for me, even though funadmentalism wasn't my background, and some of the "bathed in the blood" stuff gives me huge ICKS, I don't lump those I admire in with hateful folks like Anderson or Phelps.

What have you done today, to make ya feel PROUD?


~Heather Small


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox