News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile

Access 11/5 Senate ENDA Hearing Live Blog

Access Tuesday's Election Live Blog


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


My boilerplate response to Democratic campaign donation requests

by: ElsieElsie

Tue Jun 30, 2009 at 18:35:56 PM EDT


Tonight the second quarter of 2009 draws to a close, and it's a significant point in the 2010 campaign cycle. This is the point at which a lot of folks who are considering maybe possibly getting into a race take a hard look at their fundraising, and either throw their hat in the ring, or throw in the towel.

 This is also the point at which challenger candidates examine the funds that incumbent candidates have on hand -- and decide whether the incumbent's war chest is so formidable that s/he can outspend the challenger and own the election, or whether that incumbent looks vulnerable to a challenge.

Since I donated more than I should have in the 2008 election cycle, this means I'm getting fundraising emails and requests from all over the friggin' place, because people are scrambling to make those second quarter numbers look as flush as they possibly can.

 Below the fold, you'll read my response to every request.

ElsieElsie :: My boilerplate response to Democratic campaign donation requests
This is an example response to an entreaty received from Darcy Burner, a former challenger candidate in Washington's 8th Congressional District to Republican Congressman Dave Reichert (she lost twice, but I believed in her campaign enough to donate). She's now part of a political action committee called "Electing More and Better Democrats". She emailed me the following:

We talk a lot about wanting representatives who will display courage and conviction. But the real test of that isn't what they do when it's easy - it's what they do when it's hard.

On Friday, the U.S. House of Representatives stood with President Barack Obama and passed the Waxman-Markey energy bill, the most significant climate change legislation in history.

Six courageous freshmen members of Congress in very tough districts who risked their chances of re-election because their convictions will lead them to vote in a way that is politically damaging to them.

If you're a progressive in a marginal district,
voting no is the smart move. It gives the Republicans no ammunition against you. When gas prices are sky-high next summer, they can't say it's because you voted for a huge tax increase on energy. And you can say to progressives that you did it because this bill wasn't good enough; you're covered coming and going.

Six courageous freshmen - Tom Perriello, Dan Maffei, Betsy Markey, Steve Driehaus, Martin Heinrich and Ben Chandler stood up and cast that right vote - for a bill where President Obama and Speaker Pelosi needed each and every vote. And in those marginal districts, where we don't have the concentrations of environmentally-minded voters present in places like the district I ran in, that argument will carry weight.

We talk a lot about wanting representatives who will display courage and conviction. But the real test of that isn't what they do when it's easy - it's what they do when it's hard. Voting yes on this bill in a marginal district is hard, and clearly about choosing to do what's right over doing what would protect you politically.

There's a filing deadline tomorrow on June 30. I've just dropped $1000 I can't really afford into trying to help these members of Congress.  I'm also proud to serve as Honorary Chair of a new PAC - More and Better Democrats - who are going to work hard to get this new breed of candidate of conviction elected - and KEEPING them elected.

Will you help me?

My response:

I know this is a mass email blast, Darcy, and I have no idea where this email will end up.

As much as I want to elect more and better Democrats, my money has to go somewhere else...to organizations fighting for my civil rights. I'm gay, you see, and I donated what I could to many Democrats this past 2008 cycle (including to your campaign) in the hope that, finally, the Democratic party would live up to the promises made to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people like me this round and help us fight for equality. I also (like my husband) donated more than I could afford to fight Proposition 8, which no federal Democrat stood vocally to fight. The response from that level was somewhere between meaningless and pathetic.

I can't say I've resoundingly seen moves that show any promise that Democrats will fight for people like me on the federal level, and I have gone back to expecting nothing from your party, because that's the best way to avoid disappointment.

Like many lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered Americans, I have come to the realization that I have to own the fight myself, and I have to take the fight to the local and state levels where people have shown some willingness to stand with us and fight on our behalf. That being the case, what resources I can donate to political efforts will go to organizations like Maine Freedom to Marry, the Courage Campaign, Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, and OneIowa.

While I will still most likely vote Democratic -- few will be the Republicans willing to espouse positions I find palatable in this political climate -- and I applaud your efforts to elect more and better Democrats, I cannot donate time or money to your PAC or those candidates at this time. If and when more and better Democrats follow through on the promises they have made to people like me, enacting widely popular federal-level legislation like a repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and no longer treating my civil rights like a third rail, I will be delighted to again donate time and money to your cause.

Thanks for working to make the world a better place. I believed greatly in your congressional campaigns and wish you had beat Reichert.

The gAyTM is closed. I didn't have much to donate, but what I had is going where I know it will be put to best use.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I gave Congressman Glenn Nye (D-VA) a similar response
after he courted LGBT money and votes to get elected yet then said he was waiting for recommendations from military commanders before taking any action to repeal DADT.  We need to focus our contributions on organizations and individual candidates that have the guts to fight for our cause rather than merely give it lip service.

As Did I to Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia
in fact I wrote to every undecided Va Senator asking them to side with us on ENDA and Hate Crimes.

Brandi Parker  


[ Parent ]
While I agree with shutting down the gAyTM...
I also think that it will not be enough to get what we want. It will take a two pronged approach. We need to make the tired and silently minority on both sides of the aisle feel the pain of the quiet and hidden agenda that is keeping our changes in law out off the table. Even has they grin at us and ask for our patience. Especially the senior dems and reps in charge of the Senate!  

Always thinking about it...

less is more
I've been sending something only a paragraph or so long to everyone asking for money, and I haven't said I'd likely vote Democratic.  how does that encourage anyone to pay attention to us?  It's waffling.

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

You have a point...
...I thought the same thing after I sent it. Even so, if you don't have the ca$h, you can't run a campaign.

It's their own game back at 'em: "I support
your cause and all, but I just can't spend any capital on you right now."


[ Parent ]
Just got mine today
I got a mailing from (I think; it's out in the car right now) the DNC, containing a big "survey" about what the Dems' federal priorities should be.  Can you believe - of all the issues listed in the survey, GLBT civil rights issues weren't mentioned once?  So our rights apparently aren't even on their radar, let alone a priority.

I have a feeling they're not going to like my response.


flyer
When you get that flyer from the car, could you upload an image so those of us who aren't courted by the DNC can disseminate it. We can put an overlay of "Where's the Civil Rights?" like on the DCCC fundraising flyer.

Time to Stand! ProtestForHumanRighs.com

[ Parent ]
Sure thing.
Will do, Enigmas.  I don't have a scanner, but my friend (where I'm eating dinner tonight) does, so I'll post that as soon as possible.

[ Parent ]
WTF?
They won't get your gay dollar, but they will get your gay vote. And you're puzzled as to why they do nothing on your behalf?

/facepalm.

Wake up. Politics is not noble public servants "doing the right thing even when it's hard." What bullshit. Politics is the exchange of OBLIGATIONS. I do something for you, you do something for me.

Donks feel no obligation to LGBT voters because people like you vote for them no matter what they do.

The DNC is a corporation, and like any other company, they don't give two shits about you until you affect their market share. Closing the gAyTM is a good start, but it's going to backfire if they decide they don't really need our money either.

They can replace our money, but they can't replace our votes.

Until we show them we can affect their market share, we'll get what they think they owe us -- NOTHING.


Yeah, I'm not planning to vote for them.
I've pledged never to vote for another candidate who does not support my full equality under the law -- which means (1) talking about it, and (2) following through, or, for people running for their first term, giving me some sort of concrete timetable or other reason to believe they will follow through.

If that means I probably won't be voting for President in 2012... so be it. Fortunately I'll be able to cast a vote to re-elect both of my U.S. Senators and all of my state representatives.


[ Parent ]
I have made a similar pledge.
No support for any candidate (incumbent or no) that does not support full equality under the law for GLBT citizens.  If you're a politician that publicly says "I think marriage should be between a man and a woman," you're as good as dead to me -- Democrat or otherwise.

Be thankful that you have two good Senators that you can support.  Both of my Senators here in Georgia are strongly anti-gay rights, as I'm sure most here at PHB already know.  Any Dem that challenges them will likely have an uphill battle in the current political climate here, but if their challenger were to be even moderately supportive of gay rights, their fight would be that much more difficult.

At least at the Federal level I can still support my Congressman (John Lewis -- LOVE HIM!!!).  But otherwise, I have decided to dedicate my resources more to state and local races and causes, where the ability to effect change is markedly greater.


[ Parent ]
Exactly
They can replace our money, but they can't replace our votes.

Dollars can come from anywhere, in small and large amounts, but my vote can only come from me. I may not vote Republican, but I may can withhold my vote....

Cause any fool knows, a dog needs a home; a shelter from pigs on the wing


[ Parent ]
My boyfriend's approach:
My boyfriend takes a blue marker to every fundraising letter he receives and writes in big letters over the face of the letter: "NO MONEY UNTIL GAY MARRIAGE."

Then he puts it in the postage-prepaid envelope and mails it back to the Democrats on their own dime.

I think we should all do the same.


I simply put in subject: No Gay Equality = No Gay $$$ support
I figure they won't read the body of the email, but at least there's the subject heading.

Thank you!
What a great response! Thanks for sharing it.

The only problem I personally have with it is with the line, "I will still most likely vote Democratic." With all due respect, if the Federal Democrats don't care about gays, than I'll show them the same courtesy. I learned four years ago that the world won't end if I don't vote at all (I hated Bush but I didn't think Kerry was any better), and I wish I could take back my vote for President Obama.

From now on, I'm only voting for people I believe in. I wanted Hillary Clinton to be President, but voted for Obama because I thought he'd live up to his many promises.

I will not make that mistake again.


Wow...
So all of you are single issue voters?

You obviously have no concerns about war & peace, the environment, health care, education, immigration, the Supreme Court etc?

If you are independently wealthy enough to have no other issues on your plate, so be it.

But if you're like most Americans and have a range of issues that you think needs addressing, you should rethink your strategy and priorities.


Not a single issue
There is the marriage equality issue, the employment non-discrimination issue, the ability to serve openly in the armed forces issue, the hate crimes law issue, the schools free and safe from bullying issue, the immigration equality for same sex couples issue, the non-discrimination in public accommodations, housing and credit issue, etc, etc, etc.

[ Parent ]
As opposed to you
who is only worried about how much you're spending for your insurance policy and are voting based solely on that.

Hey, I've got insurance, and my company pays most of it. Why should I worry about you, or what's important to you? You don't worry about the rest of us.

Cause any fool knows, a dog needs a home; a shelter from pigs on the wing


[ Parent ]
Actually I'm NOT
personally worried about my health insurance. I've got insurance and it is taken care of by my employer. So strictly speaking it is not MY issue.

However I know plenty of people who do not have insurance, and have been without it in the past. I know that millions of people don't have coverage and countless others have substandard coverage or are cheated by their insurer. Knowing that there are people right here suffering from our crappy unjust system is enough for me to demand change.

Its only one of the social justice issues in which I have an interest. As a result, there is no way that I can reasonably suggest that its a good idea to empower the GOP. It is opposed to everything that I and most social justice advocates stand for.

If you have no interest in the whole range of social issues and only care about LGBT issues, so be it. But if you have an interest in the whole range of issues, there is no way you could reasonably support trying to hurt the Democrats when you know it only helps the Republicans.


[ Parent ]
Money well spent?
LGBTs are looking for equality - why shouldn't they focus their resources on that issue?  

Pam's been pushed to being a single issue funder, not voter.

Why are any of the issues you raised above more important than her equality?

Sounds like Pam has a limited amount of money to give to politics and she's going to give where she sees some good coming out of it. Hard to argue with that.  


[ Parent ]
mistaken
only when someone callously oversimplifies the issue is this a "single issue".

The issue is FREEDOM, that thing in the constitution, remember?

War & Peace?
How are we to wage war when we are discouraging qualified LGBT candidates and dismissing loyal, heroic, professional soldiers for who they love?

Environment?
Okay, you got me on this one except to say: Go to Whole Foods, look at who's buying hybrids -- gays are a hell of a lot more eco-aware, eco-friendly, and concerned with sustainability than most folks -- and we get to pay more taxes for our efforts!

Health Care?
As in the health care that I would get taxed on if I used the "domestic partnership" benefits?  Straight employees don't have to pay taxes on their family health benefits, but we do.  The gov sees domestic partnership health benefits as taxable income.

Education?
Like the one that Lawrence King was denied when Brandon shot him in the face in the middle of school?  Like the harassment that LGBT youth(and those labeled LGBT) face on a daily basis that prevents them from getting an education?

Immigration?
Only one thing to say to that:
The Uniting American Families Act.  Gay couples are in a terrible spot with immigration --- even those living in Marriage Equality states.  Thanks to DOMA, they can't sponser their spouses.

The Supreme Court?
Uh, Isn't Prop 8 making it's way there?

The "one issue" to me is making sure that the government makes good on a 200+ year old promise of freedom.  As you can see, that affects just about every other "issue" you claim we don't care about.  The US without equality for it's LGBT citizens is like a dinner party sitting down to empty plates. Complete with people saying "oh, well, we were so concerned with the guest list, the decorations, the music, the tablecloth, the centerpiece, the wine, and the serving set --- we figured the actual food could wait."

And that's what they, and people like you, are saying.  That we should wait on food, or not be so concerned with food because of everything else.  The party has started, the guests are hear, to say we can wait on the food is insanity.


[ Parent ]
Geek, it's been said before, but it bears repeating...
Not all who consider themselves G, L, B, T, or an ally are 'single issue voters'.  I would go so far as to say that quite a few of us do not fall in that category.  

However, can you tell me how being concerned about the economy is overridden by asking for ENDA?  One of the biggest concerns with the economy is the number of people who are jobless.  Passing ENDA would allow people to hold on to their jobs, reducing unemployment.  It would also help national security and the war(s) that are happening right now by overruling DADTDHDP and allowing gay service members to keep their jobs, reducing the unemployment rate even more.  It would also reduce the amount of money that the military has to spend retraining and replacing the discharged service members, freeing the money to address other concerns.  

According to SLDN there are approx 400,000 GLBT people who would enlist if DADT were repealed.  This would help ease the military recruiting shortage, which would also help American forces who are stretched too thin, with wars on 2 fronts and a third in Korea brewing.  How does that NOT address issues of importance to ALL Americans?

What good does it do to reform healthcare if I can't cover my partner without having to jump through all sorts of legal hoops and having a patchwork set of documents that is granted to married couples simply by saying "I Do."?  Should I be greatful that at least my healthcare coverage is cheaper when I'm gay bashed and the police won't or can't investigate?  That's covered under the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act.  

Immigration--A gay partner should be able to sponser his/her partner for citizenship.  That way the partner can stay in the country without facing deportation.  Currently, once a partner's visa has expired, they're considered an 'illegal alien' and the relationship either has to break up or the American partner then has to face being exiled because they can't stay together and live in this country.

Education--Tolerance can only be learned if it is taught.  ENDA keeps gay teachers employed.  These gay teachers are uniquely qualified to address bullying and other intolerant behaviors.  The same conservative attitudes that prevent teaching healthy information about GLBT issues also prevent teaching factually correct sexual health information regarding STDs, teen pregnancy and other issues.  It has also influenced other educational areas as well.  For instance, while English teachers teach about Langston Hughes and Oscar Wilde, these attitudes prevent them being recognized as influential GAY authors.  

GLBT issues are not just "single issue" questions.  The ramifications run all through the issues that the Democrats are trying to work on.  I am an American.  My tax dollars go to support the work of the government.  I am one of the people in the government "of the people, for the people, and by the people."  My issues matter.  If the Democrats are not going to support things laws that concern me and my life, why should I support them?


[ Parent ]
Maybe So
But I bet you were damn well all LGBT Issue voters or at least I known I am.....That's the first thing I want to known about any canidate is were they stand on LGBT issues ............because if they aren't for us then they ARE against us............no man can truely serve two masters.

Brandi Parker


[ Parent ]
Brandi, I think you and I said the same thing. :)
I am an LGBT Issues voter.  I just fail to see how by advocating support on these political issues I am doing a disservice to the larger group of "progressives".  I'll admit it--I'm selfish enough that, like you, I want to know where a candidate stands on issues that are central to me and my life (ENDA, Hate Crimes, Marriage equality, etc.) before I'll throw my support behind issues that only affect my life peripherally.

I would argue however, as I said above and in other threads, that the issues and bills lumped together as "GLBT issues" are not side issues, but materially affect the other issues on the nation's plate that need to be addressed.


[ Parent ]
Single Issues
Employment -- equal pay for equal work, equal opportunity to work, equity in opportunity to start a business, equity in service to the country

War & Peace: equity in representation, equity in service to the country, equity in social services, reformation of health care

The Environment: See above -- significant section of LGBT people are very much interested in environmentally friendly business and policy. If they had more access to money and representation, they'd be more likely to care, as well.

Health Care: see above -- reformation of social services and equity in social services.

Immigration: marriage equality

SCOTUS: all of the above.

I would say that its not a matter of strategy for many, but merely survival for many. I suspect you have a different view of what should be a priority.

But hey, for a single issue, its not all that singular.

Visit http://www.thespectrumcafe.com to see the T put back into LGBT news.


[ Parent ]
I'm proudly a single-issue voter.
You presume that I fail to see the big picture?

Over the years, I have been supportive of a constellation of progressive issues. The support was not returned. I live in Missouri. Today I am less secure, I am less well-off, and I actually have fewer rights that I did decades ago. The only real progress that has benefitted me was the grudging Lawrence decision that effectively decriminalized sodomy because I'm no longer presumptively criminal. Hurrah.

Progress has not come from making common-cause with other "progressives." Like you, they think that advancing their agenda is our responsibility, but advancing my agenda is my responsibility.

Very well, message received. My agenda has continuously failed for want of real support from my fellow travelers. When your agendas start failing because we're nadering your people, I'm sure you'll find that it's rather upsetting.

Try to remember that it was entirely avoidable.


[ Parent ]
The point is...
either "their agenda" is yours or its not. If your only concern for issues is solely through the prism of LGBT issues then so be it.

But if you have a genuine interest in questions of poverty, education, the environment etc...you only hurt yourself by trying to hurt someone else.


[ Parent ]
And if your only concern for issues is
to remind LGBT people that they are pedophiles and could bankrupt the entire country, then YOU could qualify for a job at the DOJ.

# Duty, duty -- honor is, is --
Honor, Creideiki -- alertly
# Shared, is -- Honor #


[ Parent ]
Yeah, wow.
If someone had concerns about war and peace, why the hell would they support the Republicrats?  (Unless they actually enjoy killing Afghan children, that is.)

[ Parent ]
I'm Torn...
We just passed last month our Bullying Bill by only 1 vote.  A single extra republican would have made the difference.  In the past it has failed by only 1 vote, and this time it passed by only 1 vote.  Granted it wasn't strictly party lines, but the support & opposition was heavily one sided.  And yesterday, for a strong finish to LGBT pride month here in NC, our democratic governor (& first female gov) signed both the Bully Bill & Healthy Youth Act (comprehensive sex ed) into law.

Don't get me wrong, most of my financial support will be going to groups like Equality NC & I don't want to in anyway be an apologist for the democratic party especially on the federal level, I just hope we don't paint the entire democratic party with the same brush.  Right now, during a recession, I have to imagine a lot of campaigns are seeing almost all their donors cut back... so while we cut back from the democratic party in general, for those who can afford it we need to stand up in a big way for our democratic allies who are out there.

I'm torn, I'm mad at a lot of the democratic party, but I also know this came down to just one vote & even the slightest pull back in support could be the differenc ein the passing or failing of Bullying Bills & Healthy Youth Acts to protect all kids including specifically LGBT students.


I like this letter
I have often written similar, but shorter things to the Dems when they ask for my money. I will save it.

I don't consider myself a single issue voter. But I do think this: if you don't have the intelligence (or the balls) to understand that prejudice against GLTB people is wrongwrongwrong, and that treating us differently because of your hangups is equally wrongwrongwrong, then I question your intelligence on any other issue as well.

I cannot think of a single republican I would vote for. At the same time, I have often said that the only party worse for the country than the dems are the repubs.

We need a multi-party system desparately in this country.


Keep Response Short and to the point
I like the last part. I am going to steal it for my own use. No one is going to read something this long without money attached. And even then, they probably won't get past the first sentence.  If I get replies I find acceptable, I will give something.

>>>>>"If and when more and better Democrats follow through on the promises they have made to people like me, enacting widely popular federal-level legislation like a repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and no longer treating my civil rights like a third rail, I will be delighted to again donate time and money to your cause.

Let me know what specifically is being done so that I can donate.

thanks."


So what?
What makes you think the DNC gives a damn about your $50?  There's only one thing the DNC really wants from you and you give that away for free.  

Face it, you don't have the dough to impress anyone in the DP and you don't have the spine to challenge the status quo.  Be happy with the crumbs your political masters throw, vent on blogs where no one will hear and get used to second class citizenship.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox